Showing posts with label Patents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patents. Show all posts

Thursday, December 6, 2012

The Essential Steps To An Effective Patent Search

Creation Submission is about obtaining a patent on your invention. Securing a patent for your invention when you've got a terrific idea that you have worked on is very possible in this day and age. The principle reasons why inventors obtain patents for their plans are to generate protect their work so that they might either sell the rights on the patent or market or manufacture the item for profit.

Patent search Before an inventor initiates the process of applying for patent, they must conduct a patent search to ensure that their invention, plan or process is eligible. An individual can conduct the search on his or her own through the database of the US patent office. This can be a time-consuming effort if you don't know your way around the system.

Many inventors hire a patent lawyer to handle the paperwork as well as the extensive search required to ensure that the patent application process goes smoothly. Since the system is computerized, it is possible to go online and conduct a thorough search. You can also research the USPTO's Patent and Trademark Depository Library for other patent-related publications.

US patent and trademark business office The US Patent and Trademark Business office, website defines an invention as "Any new and valuable approach, machine, manufacture, or composition that can make a difference, or any new and helpful advancement thereof, which, taken together, involve pretty much everything that is definitely created by a gentleman."

The US Patent and Trademark Office issued patents to inventors which give them the option to exclude many others from making, making use of, or marketing their invention while in the United States of America. In exchange for this grant, the inventors must disclose their invention to the public in an easily accessible format. A patent doesn't grant inventors the right to create, use, sell, or import their inventions. It just excludes others from doing so without permission.

The US Patent and Trademark search To buy a in-depth patent search utilizing a patent search service is about $1000. "An inventor's idea or product might have been available on the market before but the cost was too great to continue manufacturing, or it might be patented under another use that is unrelated to the search criteria. If nothing turns up when using the free U.S. Patent Office patent search database, it might be time to hire a patent attorney or patent search firm at an initial price of about $1,000 for any more in-depth search. The price of a basic patent search within the Washington D.C., area runs between $200 and $300.

If you have been given the all clear signal to go ahead and apply for your patent after the search has concluded, it's time to make sure all your paperwork is organized and ready for presentation. The patent agent who handles your claim may take an average of three days to review and investigate the claim but it will take a lot longer to get your patent approved.

Gene Patenting Fact   Software Patent Infringement Strategies   Why Can Patents Be Granted for Multiple Similar Inventions?   Using Archived Software Products As an Intellectual Property Portfolio   

5 Tips For Claims Writing

Without claims, a patent will be like a boat without a rudder. Claims provide some exclusive rights or scopes of protection to the inventor or patent holder. Phrasing or wording sense of claims is responsible for giving a defined legal protection to the patent holders. Valuable claims also help in stopping the infringing activities of other competitors or third parties.

Tips for claims writing

1. Systematic order of claim writing

- Independent claim should be write first. And, it should have broad scope of protection.

- After writing the independent claim, dependent claims should have to write in a well delineated manner, so that all limitations of independent claim can be covered aptly.

2. Clear and crisp in meaning

- Claim sentences should be clear and crisp. Because, these sentences are responsible for defining more transparent and valuable meanings of the claims.

- Try to avoid the use of those words that have broad meaning or not having a defined limitation. For example, "heavy", "large", "used in large extant", "mostly required" etc. Because, they have subjective idea or sense in their meaning, not to an objective judgment.

3. Fully structured and having all elements

- All necessary elements or words should be present in a claim means it must not be incomplete.

- It should cover all inventive features, embodiments, technical applications of invention as well as scopes of protection.

- Each claim should be written in single sentence.

- Introductory phrase part, linking part and body of the claim part all should be arranged in a well delineated manner.

4. Fully supported by description part

- The basis of claim writing should be sufficiently mentioned in the description part of patent application.

- Each part or term i.e. mentioned in claims should be directly or indirectly inferred from the description part of the patent application. Sometimes, when claims are not supported by the description part, then the chances of cancellation during patent office examining gets increase.

5. Use of best suited phrases and words

- In introductory part, we generally write about the field or type of invention.

- In body part, inventive features should be written in association with valid legal scopes of invention.

- As we know that linking words or phrases are used to describe the relation between introductory part and body part.

- Some famed phrases or words those are generally used in linking part mentioned below

a. "consisting of" b. "consisting essentially of" c. "including" d. "which comprises".

Gene Patenting Fact   Software Patent Infringement Strategies   Why Can Patents Be Granted for Multiple Similar Inventions?   Using Archived Software Products As an Intellectual Property Portfolio   Patent Riches Through Licensing   

The Software Patent Process

Software is a huge and expanding market characterized by rapid product innovation. In addition, software is also increasingly key to distinguishing and adding value to other products ranging from automobiles to video books. As a result, software patents are important to prevent competitors from taking advantage of one's software inventions. However, many software inventors are unclear about the process of patenting software.

The software patent process typically begins with a patent search. A search helps determine if the subject matter of the invention is patentable, and the likely scope of a patent. The search finds similar inventions, referred to as art, that may limit the breadth of the patent or preclude allowance of the patent altogether. The information is invaluable in deciding whether to file a patent application, and how to structure it. However, much of the art for cutting edge software technology is still not public at the time of the search, so the decision must include estimates of the current state of the technology.

If you decide to proceed with a patent application, the inventors disclose the details of the invention to a patent attorney. From that disclosure, I prefer to prepare an initial set of claims and drawings that I then review with the inventors. The second (and third) discussion of the invention usually brings out additional aspects of the invention that can be protected. After the inventors are satisfied that the claims and drawings accurate capture the invention, I draft the application. The application must be prepared to anticipate and provide alternatives for multiple technical obstacles to allowance of the patent. After an inventor review, we file the application and drawings with inventor declarations, assignments, and information disclosure statements.

And then we wait. Examination usually begins 1-3 years later, although there are ways to accelerate this. Occasionally examination begins with a restriction requirement, where the examiner asserts that the application includes more than one invention. This may be because we intentionally included multiple inventions to differ costs, and sometimes because the examiner things the invention is too broad. There are a number of effective ways to deal with restriction requirements.

Usually there is no restriction requirement, and the examiner rejects all or most of the claims because of prior art that is found in the examiner's own search. The examiner will assert that this art shows that your invention is not novel or was obvious. We analyze these rejections, and determine which arguments are valid and which don't hold water. We then create a strategy combining persuading the examiner and modifying the patent claims to overcome the rejections. We discuss this strategy with the examiner to get feedback and to persuade. To help get broad claims allowed, I take time to determine the best persuasive strategy for each examiner.

We then file a formal response based on the strategy, which the examiner considers. The examiner usually conducts another search, and may find a new reason to reject your application. Sometimes a number of iterations are required before finding the right combination of language and scope to both protect your invention and have the claims of the application allowed by the examiner. The number of iterations is highly dependent on the breadth of the claims that you want. Broader, more valuable claims take more work, and sometimes even an appeal to be allowed. After the application is allowed, there are issue fees and then maintenance fees after 3.5, 7.5, and 11.5 years.

Protecting a software patent is a long and expensive process. However, when compared with the economic costs of allowing a competitor to copy your innovation and take advantage of your development work, a software patent is bargain.

Gene Patenting Fact   Software Patent Infringement Strategies   Why Can Patents Be Granted for Multiple Similar Inventions?   Using Archived Software Products As an Intellectual Property Portfolio   Patent Riches Through Licensing   New Simplified Process of Filing of PCT National Phase Applications in India   

Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Français Deutsch Italiano Português
Español 日本語 한국의 中国简体。